To print: Click here or Select File and then Print from your browser's menu
This story was printed from silicon.com, located at http://www.silicon.com/
Story URL: http://software.silicon.com/security/0,39024655,39254652,00.htm
The 'multi-component' malware threat
Businesses beware a 'snowball effect'
By Vivian Yeo
Published: Wednesday 02 July 2008
Malware is becoming increasingly complex, designed with multiple components that target different enterprise weaknesses, according to industry watchers.
In other words, the next security threat that hits your organisation could be a keylogger, Trojan and 'bot' rolled into one.
The first component will trigger off "a chain of other components that seek to stealthily accomplish" the intended purpose, according to Arun Chandrasekaran, industry manager for ICT practice at consulting firm Frost & Sullivan.
Security from A to Z
Click on the links below to find out more...
A is for Antivirus
B is for Botnets
C is for CMA
D is for DDoS
E is for Extradition
F is for Federated identity
G is for Google
H is for Hackers
I is for IM
J is for Jaschan (Sven)
K is for Kids
L is for Love Bug
M is for Microsoft
N is for Neologisms
O is for Orange
P is for Passwords
Q is for Questions
R is for Rootkits
S is for Spyware
T is for Two-factor authentication
U is for USB sticks/devices
V is for Virus variants
W is for Wi-fi
X is for OS X
Y is for You
Z is for Zero-day
Jens Andreassen, vice president for Asia-Pacific at Fortinet, told silicon.com sister site ZDNet Asia in an email that multi-component threats have existed for several years but today's blended threats have many more components or functionalities "to maximise the opportunity for a successful attack".
Andreassen said: "As security products add multiple layers of defence, cybercriminals are matching this with a multi-component offence approach. Multi-component threats are…becoming more sophisticated and adding more and more components for a snowball effect," adding that malware writers are also tapping on "higher-profile vehicles, such as blogs and social-networking sites".
According to Paul Ducklin, head of technology for the Asia-Pacific region at Sophos, the web has aided the rise of multi-component threats.
He said: "Most modern malware involves a series of attack stages, relying on and using a number of parts. With the internet, it is no longer necessary for the malware to carry around all the pieces it needs in a single file or on a single disk; additional parts can be easily downloaded when needed."
According to Ducklin, security vendors face both challenges and opportunities in dealing with multi-component threats. "The most obvious challenge is that, when we see one part of a multi-component threat, we don't automatically know where this component fits in to the entire attack."
He said: "For example, we might receive an exploit which downloads a piece of malware from a URL which is not yet active. So, although we can now proactively block any future downloads, we can't yet say what risk the link poses to an unprotected computer."
On the other hand, there are more avenues to counter the threat; attacks can be thwarted by blocking any one of the components involved, noted Ducklin.
He said: "Such attacks have all the weaknesses of an electrical circuit - cut a wire anywhere and the whole thing goes dead - compared to the strengths of a parallel circuit, in which each component has to be isolated separately."
Businesses, said Ducklin, run into the danger of having their corporate websites used as "a staging post" for malware attacks. According to Ducklin, about 80 per cent of all infected web pages are on compromised, legitimate sites.
Suffering a website attack not only damages the company's reputation by highlighting the fact that there is a security problem, it is also time-consuming and costly to repair, Ducklin pointed out. In addition, legitimate visitors may no longer be able to use the site effectively, and end up visiting a competitor's site instead.
Frost & Sullivan's Chandrasekaran added: "Due to the stealthy nature, many users might not detect any abnormality in their system behaviour and performance". Businesses, therefore, need to have a "defence-in-depth approach to security" and educate employees on security hazards in a timely manner, he said.
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page