
Market suffers by having "one dominant vendor"
By Peter Judge
Published: 21 April 2008 08:42 GMT
Red Hat has quashed speculation that it was planning a consumer desktop version of Linux to compete with Windows, saying it is focused on enterprise systems and would not be able to make such a product profitably.
Red Hat's desktop team said in a blog report: "We have no plans to create a traditional desktop product for the consumer market in the foreseeable future. As a public, for-profit company, Red Hat must create products and technologies with an eye on the bottom line, and with desktops this is much harder to do than with servers. The desktop market suffers from having one dominant vendor, and some people still perceive that today's Linux desktops simply don't provide a practical alternative."
Latest photo stories from silicon.com
1. Photos: Australian broadband goes for a deep-sea dive
2. Photos: Talons, Eagles and Enforcers - the tech behind war
3. Photos: Introducing - the world's lightest mobile phone
4. Photos: Smart posters and the 'seeing eye phone'
5. Photos: £1,000 reward for PM's fingerprints
6. Photos: Eavesdropping on the net
7. Photos: Satellites free the roads from snow and ice
8. Photos: The Colossus WWII codebreaking machine
9. Photos: US military puts 'bat' spies in the sky…
10. Photos: Conquering the arctic wilderness
The post acknowledges that "technically savvy users" see Linux as a practical alternative but says this is not enough to build a sustainable business around the Linux desktop: "History is littered with example efforts that have either failed outright, are stalled or are run as charities," it said. Analysts and commentators have backed the decision, agreeing Red Hat is not a consumer company, and getting users to pay for a Linux desktop would be an uphill struggle when Windows is usually bundled with the hardware. "Red Hat has always been about the corporate market, the enterprise market, the server market," said silicon.com sister site ZDNet.com blogger Dana Blankenhorn. "[Red Hat's] efforts on the desktop have been, essentially, throwaways."
The company's decision to stay away from the consumer desktop is less about Microsoft's dominance there than about Ubuntu, which is the leading challenger in that space, Blankenhorn said. He said: "I don't know why this needs repeating. Linux is not like Windows. It's not one company. It's an ecosystem. Everyone does what they're best at, and that's how it works. Anyone who has read anything about open source for any length of time understands Ubuntu's commitment to the desktop, and its dominance of that portion of the Linux market."
Although it's not working on a consumer desktop, it is planning a product for Intel resellers to ship in emerging markets, which will be called Red Hat Global Desktop. Apart from this, its main desktop focus will be its commercial, supported Enterprise Linux Desktop, as well as the free unsupported Fedora desktop.
Original article: Red Hat says no to consumer Linux desktop from ZDNet UK
Work for a recognised internationally leading global company as a Senior UNIX Systems Administrator. Based in the UK but focused at a Global level, ...
s marketing activities.The company will be marketing commercial applications at the cutting edge of machine vision and advanced image processing ...
Experience of working within an ISO20000 compliant environment with emphasis on Change, Incident and Problem management is an advantage.ACS is an ...
Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.
Stories from the web...
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page
Clive Longbottom Windows 7: Not perfect - but ready for prime time Microsoft's latest OS fixes most of Vista's ills - but still has challenges ahead
Stephen Kleynhans Mind the details with Windows 7 Just because it might work better than Vista, it doesn't mean you can be sloppy