
Linux provider finds that Linux TCO is lower...
Published: 13 December 2004 11:15 GMT
Linux provider Cybersource has updated its two-year-old study comparing the total cost of ownership (TCO) when using Microsoft's products against open-source solutions - only to find that Linux is still cheaper.
The study comes after a wave of similar "independent" studies that have been commissioned by Microsoft or its partners and indicate that proprietary software is cheaper than open-source solutions. Microsoft has been actively marketing the results of these studies as part of its "Get The Facts" campaign.
Con Zymaris, Cybersource's chief executive, said that although the company is identified as a Linux solution provider, it has "made a great effort to prepare a balanced and open analysis".
"The prices used for the study, along with research methodology, vendor specifications, cost calculator tabulations and final results are all included, so that these results can be verified by others. Which is more than we can say for any of the TCO reports that Microsoft touts in its current carpet-bombing anti-Linux advertising campaign," said Zymaris.
According to the latest study, entitled Linux vs. Windows TCO Comparison: The Final Numbers Are In, for a company with 250 users, Linux solutions will cost between 27 per cent and 36 per cent less than Microsoft's products over a three year period.
The numbers are based on hardware, software, networking, staffing, consultancy fees, internet access, desktop productivity applications, training and miscellaneous system costs. In its updated report, which was first published in April 2002, Cybersource has also included a comparison with paid-for solutions from Red Hat.
In an effort to gain further credibility, Cybersource says it gave Microsoft a 'head start' by ignoring the costs of dealing with viruses and any costs associated with downtime resulting from reboots and crashes. Additionally, the company said it has tripled the budget for external Linux consultants because one of Microsoft's arguments is that open source requires an "increased reliance" on them.
Zymaris said that organisations and many governments are investigating the Linux option and it hopes the study will make the decision easier.
"The final numbers are startling. We've given Microsoft every head start possible but Linux's cost advantage is simply too great for most organisations to ignore," concluded Zymaris.
The full report is available in PDF format from the Cybersource website.
Munir Kotadia writes for ZDNet Australia.
It's a shame they didn't take usability and user s...
Jamie Bishop
Next time, try using the bulk licensing prices (Mi...
Anonymous
How can a study in this case ever be independent. ...
Anonymous
The results will point one way, yes - but I doubt ...
Goten Xiao
Just assuming the figures are right....or thereabo...
Anonymous
My client is seeking a Linux Support Engineer to provide support the business within a high quality secure computing environment by providing and ...
Java / .Net Software Developers - cool open source projects (City) Java / J2EE / C# / .NET / C++ With the price of celebrity plastic on the rise and ...
An amazing opportunity to be VP of Technology / CTO for one of brightest and coolest brands in the online, community and social networking world. My ...
Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.
Stories from the web...
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page
Bob Tarzey Why you must rein in your power users When they do damage, it can be catastrophic to your business
Jon Collins Is losing a mobile device really such a big deal? How to minimise the damage to your business