
Like: Can developers be trusted?
By Robert Lemos
Published: 21 November 2002 16:40 GMT
The questionable handling of a fix for a recent widespread software vulnerability has some administrators worried that developers can't be trusted to make security a top priority.
Last week, the Internet Software Consortium withheld the patch for a critical flaw in the domain name system (DNS) software from a large number of researchers, asking instead that each person send the organisation an email request in order to get the fix.
The software, known as the Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) program, performs a critical function as the address book for the net.
The delay, coupled with messages sent to several administrators urging them to pay to become part of an early-warning group run by the ISC, has some security experts in the US worried that security is taking a back seat to secrecy and money.
"It's a concern, especially with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act being used by some companies to threaten researchers," said Greg Shipley, chief technology officer of security consultancy Neohapsis. "The bottom line is the industry cannot agree on a responsible disclosure process, and the community and the internet at large suffer."
For the past two years, Richard Clarke, special presidential adviser for cybersecurity, has expounded the need for software companies and developers to understand that America's national security could rely on how responsibly software vulnerabilities, and their fixes, are handled.
The ISC's decision to withhold the patch is the latest incident to call into question whether software companies, security researchers, and open-source development groups can be relied on to responsibly handle the vulnerabilities found in the software that forms the foundation of the internet.
Earlier this year, Hewlett-Packard threatened a researcher with a lawsuit under the DMCA. The pro-copyright law that has been used against security analysts who claim they're performing a public service when they discover ways to circumvent security measures and then make the risks known. And last month, unknown attackers unleashed a flood of data at a key group of DNS servers, known as root servers, raising the spectre of an all-out internet collapse. Those incidents make it plain that key components rely on the judgment of computer experts and code slingers with widely varying agendas. The delays in delivering a patch for the bug in BIND spotlight the problem.
Robert Lemos writes for News.com
Working with the quant researchers for providing data and trading integration with their strategies. Essential: C++, STL, Boost, Low latency / high ...
Your main activities will involve; Task Management - ensuring effective and efficient throughput is regularly achieved, Incident Management - taking ...
Observe strict compliance to licensing, copyright and trademark legislation The objective of the Technical Support Analyst is to resolve remote users ...
Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.
Stories from the web...
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page
Nick Heath Your top HR tech priorities for next year revealed How to make human resources IT work for you
Bob Tarzey Why you must rein in your power users When they do damage, it can be catastrophic to your business