You are here: silicon.com > Software > Applications

Applications

Is software as a service really cheaper?

Here's what you need to know before taking the plunge

Tags: gartner, implementation, integration, cost

By Tim Ferguson

Published: 20 February 2009 16:40 GMT

The benefits of software as a service (SaaS) may not be as clear cut as they seem, with the focus on the initial savings hiding issues that could reduce its advantage over packaged software in the longer term.

One of the main issues identified by analyst house Gartner is that although SaaS is cheaper in the short term due to the lower capital investment, total cost of ownership could actually turn out to be more expensive in the long run.

The main reason for this is that SaaS requires regular payments to the vendor by companies which use the software - as opposed to one-off payments for on-premise software.

Gartner VP Robert Desisto said: "SaaS is an operating item which stays at a certain rate and never comes down."

And while upgrades on packaged software can push costs up again, in general the investment required becomes less each year, he said.

Desisto said the economic situation is undoubtedly boosting SaaS, with businesses having less money to invest: "There's a natural attraction to SaaS right now because of the fact that it's less expensive over the first few years, which quite frankly people are thinking of right now."

But Desisto said the issue that SaaS may turn out to be more expensive in the long term is something businesses should be aware of.

Gartner also questions whether SaaS is faster to deploy than more conventional software, and argued the time to deploy both types of software is comparable once customisation, configuration and integration are taken into account.

"The real time that goes into deploying enterprise apps is not so much in the technical aspect but in the other elements of developing the data model, workflows, business process and integration - and with that kind of stuff you're not going to gain any advantage with SaaS," said Desisto.

Gartner suggests that despite SaaS vendors saying businesses only pay for the capacity they use, like utilities, in reality organisations normally have to sign up to contracts linked to the number of users rather than how often apps are used.

In terms of integration, Gartner says SaaS is similar to traditional software but is complicated by the fact it takes place outside the corporate firewall as well as bandwidth.

  1. Zones
  2. Management
  3. Networks
  4. Software
  5. IT Services
  6. Hardware
  1. Verticals
  2. Public Sector
  3. Financial Services
  4. Retail & Leisure

Clive Longbottom Windows 7: Not perfect - but ready for prime time Microsoft's latest OS fixes most of Vista's ills - but still has challenges ahead

Stephen Kleynhans Mind the details with Windows 7 Just because it might work better than Vista, it doesn't mean you can be sloppy


  • Jobs
Business Analyst/Systems Analyst - Payments SANCTIONS W&I

Business Analyst/Systems Analyst for a leading Retail Bank within Payments. Payments screening project. The primary objective is to enhance Wealth & ...

SCM ERP B2B ?SAAS? Integration Solutions ? Major Account Manager Sales

Our client is a pioneer and Gartner leader in the growing on-demand SAAS - business process management and integration solutions for collaborative ...

Payments Principal Consultant, Package to 120k

Payments Principal Consultant, Package to 120k. Joining the Banking practice, you will lead large business transformation programmes often with a ...

Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.





Quick Sitemap Links: