
Content with content u-turn
Published: 18 February 2009 15:32 GMT
Facing a US federal complaint from a privacy advocacy organisation and a revolt by tens of thousands of its users, Facebook backed down on Tuesday night from what many have seen as an onerous privacy policy.
The policy had seemed to grant Facebook perpetual rights to content uploaded by users, and the threatened complaint from the Electronic Privacy Information Center (Epic) had demanded, essentially, that the social networking service return to its previous terms.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote in a blog post late Tuesday that the company had decided to do just that.
"Many of us at Facebook spent most of today discussing how best to move forward. One approach would have been to quickly amend the new terms with new language to clarify our positions further. Another approach was simply to revert to our old terms while we begin working on our next version. As we thought through this, we reached out to respected organisations to get their input.
"Going forward, we've decided to take a new approach towards developing our terms. We concluded that returning to our previous terms was the right thing for now. As I said yesterday, we think that a lot of the language in our terms is overly formal and protective so we don't plan to leave it there for long," the post said.
Zuckerberg also said the company will be adopting a new set of terms that would more carefully take users' rights into consideration.
"More than 175 million people use Facebook. If it were a country, it would be the sixth most populated country in the world. Our terms aren't just a document that protect our rights; it's the governing document for how the service is used by everyone across the world. Given its importance, we need to make sure the terms reflect the principles and values of the people using the service.
"Our next version will be a substantial revision from where we are now. It will reflect the principles I described yesterday around how people share and control their information, and it will be written clearly in language everyone can understand. Since this will be the governing document that we'll all live by, Facebook users will have a lot of input in crafting these terms," Zuckerberg wrote.
The move came after Facebook had, earlier in the day, polled its users as to whether it should revert to its previous terms. And in his blog, Zuckerberg said the company would be asking users to get involved in crafting the next set of terms.
"If you'd like to get involved in crafting our new terms," Zuckerberg wrote, "you can start posting your questions, comments and requests in the group we've created - Facebook Bill of Rights and Responsibilities. I'm looking forward to reading your input."
Original article: Facebook backs down on privacy terms from CNET News.com
Or any other language as long as the output does not have further dependencies on the target platform to run the automation program (windows without ...
A Business Analyst is required to support the business in gathering, defining and documenting business requirements in order to ensure that ...
Our work is driven by a strong set of core values that define our culture, how we work and everything we produce ? MOO is a values-led business. MOO ...
Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.
Stories from the web...
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page
Bob Tarzey Why you must rein in your power users When they do damage, it can be catastrophic to your business
Jon Collins Is losing a mobile device really such a big deal? How to minimise the damage to your business